Browsing by Subject "Mite control"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2

Lithium chloride leads to concentration dependent brood damages in honey bee hives (Apis mellifera) during control of the mite Varroa destructor
(2022) Rein, Carolin; Makosch, Marisa; Renz, Julia; Rosenkranz, Peter
Lithium chloride (LiCl) has a high efficacy against Varroa destructor and a good tolerability for adult bees but the effect of LiCl on the honey bee brood has not been taken into consideration yet. We quantified the mortality of larvae fed with different concentrations of LiCl. For artificially reared larvae already, a concentration of 1 mM had significant toxic effects while under colony conditions, 10 mM was well tolerated. However, a chronic application of the effective concentration of 25 mM elicited brood mortalities between 60 and 90%. Shorter feeding periods of 2 or 4 days reduced the brood damages significantly. Measurements of the lithium concentrations in larvae and pupae during a chronic exposure with 10, 17.5 and 25 mM LiCl revealed respective lithium levels in 5th instar larvae of 7, 13 and 15 mg/kg. No lithium was detectable in 2-day old larvae indicating that pure worker jelly from the hypopharyngeal gland is not contaminated with LiCl. Based on these results, applications of LiCl in colonies with brood should be avoided.
Temporal increase of Varroa mites in trap frames used for drone brood removal during the honey bee season
(2022) Odemer, Richard; Odemer, Franziska; Liebig, Gerhard; de Craigher, Doris
Varroa mites are highly attracted to drone brood of honey bees (Apis mellifera), as it increases their chance of successful reproduction. Therefore, drone brood removal with trap frames is common practice among beekeepers in Europe and part of sustainable varroa control. However, it is considered labour‐intensive, and there are doubts about the effectiveness of this measure. At present, it is mostly unknown how many mites a drone frame can carry at different times of the season, and how many mites can be removed on average if this measure is performed frequently. Therefore, we sampled a total of 262 drone frames with varying proportion of capped cells (5–100%) from 18 different apiaries. Mites were washed out from brood collected from mid‐April to mid‐July based on a standard method to obtain comparable results. We found that a drone frame carried a median of 71.5 mites, and with the removal of four trap frames, about 286 mites can be removed per colony and season. In addition, mite counts were significantly higher in June and July than in April and May (Tukey‐HSD, P < 0.05). The number of mites and the proportion of capped cells, however, were not correlated (R2 < 0.01, P < 0.05). Our results suggest that drone brood removal is effective in reducing Varroa destructor numbers in colonies, supporting the findings of previous studies on the efficacy of this measure. Although mite counts varied, we believe that increasing sample size over different seasons and locations could elucidate infestation patterns in drone brood and ultimately improve drone brood removal as an integrated pest management tool for a wider audience of beekeepers.