Browsing by Subject "Protein-Interaktionen"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Funktion und Dynamik eines gemeinsamen Insertionskomplexes der Sec-Translokase und YidC-Insertase in der bakteriellen Membran
    (2020) Steudle, Anja; Kuhn, Andreas
    YidC/Oxa1/Alb3-insertases and the Sec-translocase are conserved across all three kingdoms of life and constitute the most important pathway for integral proteins into cell membranes and membranes of eukaryotic organelles. The insertion of membrane proteins into the inner membrane of Gram-negative bacteria occurs mainly via the SecYEG-translocase and the YidC-insertase acting independently or in cooperation. For the cooperative insertion a close contact between SecY and YidC is assumed. Previous interaction-studies and a recently solved low-resolution structure of the so-called holo-translocon (14 Å) indicate a contact between the lateral gate of SecY and the hydrophobic substrate slide of YidC. Which specific domains of YidC and SecY thereby interact directly with each other was unknown so far. The aim of this study was to describe the contact between SecY and YidC in more detail. A high affinity for the interaction of the two proteins in detergent and in DOPC-proteoliposomes was determined via FRET measurements with fluorescently labeled SecY and YidC. For the stoichiometric ratio of the SecY/YidC-interaction a factor of one was calculated. To identify the specific contacts between SecY and YidC in vivo disulphide cross-linking experiments were performed. Direct interactions between the transmembrane domain (TM) 3 and TM8 of the SecY lateral gate and TM3 and TM5 of the hydrophobic slide of YidC were found, respectively. Furthermore, a YidC mutant with five serine substitutions, which was unable to rescue a YidC depletion strain, was investigated. Even though the serine positions are located in the middle and the periplasmic half of the hydrophobic slide of YidC and four of the positions are identical with substrate contact sites, no inhibition of insertion for the YidC-dependent substrates M13 procoat and Pf3 coat by the 5S mutant compared to the wildtype YidC was observed. For the YidC-only pathway a minimum of hydrophobicity seems to be required sufficient to allow the insertion of these substrates. In vitro FRET measurements showed an impaired interaction between SecY and the YidC 5S mutant and confirmed once again an involvement of the hydrophobic slide in the SecY/YidC-contact. Based on the cross-linking contacts and the results of the FRET measurements a possible model of the SecY/YidC-contact was established, which shows the SecY lateral gate vis-à-vis of the hydrophobic slide and the hydrophilic groove between TM3 and TM5 of YidC generating a combined SecY/YidC-cavity. Taken together, the present study provides further evidence that the lateral gate of the Sec-translocase directly interacts with the hydrophobic slide of YidC. In a further project, a SecY-YidC fusion protein was cloned to ensure the two proteins are in close proximity, the correct orientation and proper stoichiometry after reconstitution into proteoliposomes. For a collaboration with the ETH Zürich, proteoliposomes hosting the fusion protein, SecYEG, YidC or SecYEG and YidC together were prepared by myself in Hohenheim. The stepwise insertion of the Sec/YidC-dependent substrate LacY into these proteoliposomes was observed by a collaborating group of the ETH Zürich using AFM–based single-molecule force spectroscopy. The insertion of LacY was observed for the different cases but for the fusion protein and SecYEG combined with YidC the insertion process is dominated by the Sec-translocase, whereas YidC probably only has a supporting function in the folding of the protein.