Browsing by Subject "Soil quality"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Agriculture in responsibility for our common world
    (2022) Raupp, Manfred G.; Thomas, Angelika; Schüle, Heinrich; Carabet, Alin Flavius; Salasan, Cosmin; Fora, Ciprian George; Weinmann, Markus; Madora GmbH; University of Hohenheim, Institute of Crop Science; Klara Bradacova
    The vocational training course program “Agriculture in Responsibility for our common World” organised within the frame of the Banat Green Deal Project “GreenERDE” (Education and Research in the context of the digital and ecological transformation of agriculture in the Banat Region and Baden-Württemberg - towards resource efficiency and resilience) and delivered between June 2021 and May 2022 targets the knowledge and experience transfer to the farmer community in the Banat Region, Romania and other parts of the world. Current and future challenges, such as the ecological conversion and digital transformation of agricultural production, but also social, economic and cultural aspects haven been addressed transcending prevailing patterns. The innovative and relevant knowledge originating from practice, experiments, research or development projects throughout Europe and other continents is presented in a training format for interested participants.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Land Preparation Methods and Soil Quality of a Vertisol Area in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia
    (2005) Jijo, Teklu Erkossa; Stahr, Karl
    The industrialization of agriculture led to societal concerns for environmental protection and food quality in developed countries. On the other hand, the need for increased agricultural productivity to address the persistent poverty and food insecurity in developing countries is intensified. Thus, improved management systems to meet the double objectives of increased productivity and sustained environmental quality are increasingly required. The assessment of soil quality and productivity are among the means of monitoring the various management systems to achieve the goals. Among the interrelated definitions formulated for soil quality, a committee established by Soil Science Society of America for the same purpose defined it as the capacity of soil to function within natural and managed ecosystem boundaries to sustain plant and animal productivity, maintain or enhance soil, water and air quality and support human health and habitation. The central idea in most of the definitions is the capacity of the soil to function. The capacity of a soil to function depends on its inherent properties derived from its genesis and the dynamic properties resulting from the prevailing management systems. Most of the hitherto soil quality assessments considered agricultural production as the major management goal. As this study was conducted in the highlands of Ethiopia where food security remains a basic challenge, the primary management goal could not be different. Shortage and fragmentation of land driven by population pressure have become issues of concern in the area. With a continually dwindling national land-holding average of only one ha per household, farmers struggle to produce enough to feed their families. Since the possibility of expanding agricultural land is limited, increased production is realistic only from higher productivity per unit land per unit time. Covering about 8 million ha, Vertisols are among the high potential soils, where significant increase in productivity is likely. However, their productivity is constrained by their physical and hydrological properties, manifested by their hardness when dry and their stickiness when wet, impeding land preparation. The traditional management systems led neither to increased productivity nor to enhanced soil quality. Thus, the need for alternative technologies is paramount. Despite a concerted effort during the last two decades to develop improved technologies for the soils, land preparation for agricultural productivity and sustaiability remains a major challenge. In addition to technical difficulties associated with their nature and deep-rooted poverty and illiteracy, lack of farmers? participation is believed to have hampered the development and adoption of robust technologies. The challenge facing the soil management research in Ethiopia is thus double fold: development of technologies that swiftly increase agricultural production and ensure judicious use of the land resources. Farmers are the ultimate decision makers on their plots, at least in Ethiopia, often irrespective of the consequences of their decisions. Simple technologies are required to manipulate their decisions in favour of the desired goals. This requires development of technologies that fit into their aspiration, tradition and socio-cultural values with their participation in the generation and evaluation of the technologies. This study was to identify alternative land preparation methods for increased productivity and economic profitability, while maintaining or enhancing the soil quality of the Vertisols. The hypothesis tested was that the alternative land preparation methods improve soil productivity and maintain or enhance soil quality. Three alternatives, Broad Bed and Furrow (BBF), Green Manure (GM) and Reduced Tillage (RT) with the traditional method, Ridge and Furrow (RF) were compared for 6 years, setting crop yield, economic profitability, and soil erosion and soil quality as performance indicators. This on station experiment was complemented by a participatory assessment at a small watershed scale. The objectives of the latter were identification of local soil functions, definition of soil quality concepts, and identification of soil quality indicators and evaluation of the soils for the major functions. Land preparation methods influence soil functions through their effects on soils qualities. Among the soil physical quality indicators considered, GM increased aggregate stability and reduced surface crust strength due to its increased OM content and microbial activities. While RT led to least penetration resistance, infiltration, water-holding capacity, and moisture content were less sensitive to the treatments. The chemical characteristics and plant nutrients response was not consistent indicating the need of longer time for the effects to show a clear trend. Organic carbon and MBC content of the soil increased due to RT and GM, but the increment was not proportional leading to lower microbial quotient. This indicates SOM build up with a long-term soil quality improvement. The effect on runoff was inconsistent during the first three years (1998-2000), but BBF and RT slightly increased. In 2001 and 2002, BBF drained 67% and 54 %, respectively, of the seasonal rainfall as runoff while RT routed 61% and 53%. There is a non significant tendency of increased soil and nutrient losses from BBF and RT due to the increased runoff. BBF significantly increased the grain yield of lentils by 59% (1.03 t ha-1 to 1.63 t ha-1) compared to the control. Similarly, RT resulted in the highest grain yield of wheat (1.86 t ha-1) and tef (1.34 t ha-1). Economically, BBF is the most profitable option for lentils with 65% increase in total gross margin while RT resulted in 11% and 8% increase in gross margin of wheat and tef, respectively, as compared to the control. The soil quality index was not significantly affected by the land preparation methods. Nevertheless, GM has shown a slight enhancement with the highest SQI, followed by BBF and RT. Thus, the land preparation methods are favoured in order of GM> BBF> RT> RF, for soil quality. The relative enhancement of soil quality by GM was linked mainly to its increased Corg content. The performance indicators (productivity, economic profitability, soil conservation and soil quality) are also affected differently. A matrix ranking of the effects on the indicators showed that none of treatments is superior for all the indicators. The average of the ranks (no weight attached) showed that BBF was the most favourable followed by RT. Therefore, the methods are preferred in the order of BBF> RT>GM=RF considering the overall indicators. The superiority of BBF and RT corresponds to their productivity and economic benefits. For soil quality and erosion control, GM is a favourable option. However, as its economic benefit was low, further improvement is required. In addition, lack of fast growing legumes tolerant to both shortage and excess water, failure of the short rain for planting, cost of chopping and incorporating the cover crops and the possible need of special equipment for incorporating may hinder its wider application and hence need further investigation. The success of the alternatives depends on the farmers? capacity and willingness to invest. As the issues of soil quality and land degradation are more of societal concerns than of the individual farmers, external technical and financial incentives are desirable to enhance their capacity and to initiate their interest. Institutional and policy issues influencing agriculture and natural resource management and uncertainties like variation in weather deserve judicious consideration.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Soil-improving cropping systems for sustainable and profitable farming in Europe
    (2022) Hessel, Rudi; Wyseure, Guido; Panagea, Ioanna S.; Alaoui, Abdallah; Reed, Mark S.; van Delden, Hedwig; Muro, Melanie; Mills, Jane; Oenema, Oene; Areal, Francisco; van den Elsen, Erik; Verzandvoort, Simone; Assinck, Falentijn; Elsen, Annemie; Lipiec, Jerzy; Koutroulis, Aristeidis; O’Sullivan, Lilian; Bolinder, Martin A.; Fleskens, Luuk; Kandeler, Ellen; Montanarella, Luca; Heinen, Marius; Toth, Zoltan; Hallama, Moritz; Cuevas, Julián; Baartman, Jantiene E. M.; Piccoli, Ilaria; Dalgaard, Tommy; Stolte, Jannes; Black, Jasmine E.; Chivers, Charlotte-Anne
    Soils form the basis for agricultural production and other ecosystem services, and soil management should aim at improving their quality and resilience. Within the SoilCare project, the concept of soil-improving cropping systems (SICS) was developed as a holistic approach to facilitate the adoption of soil management that is sustainable and profitable. SICS selected with stakeholders were monitored and evaluated for environmental, sociocultural, and economic effects to determine profitability and sustainability. Monitoring results were upscaled to European level using modelling and Europe-wide data, and a mapping tool was developed to assist in selection of appropriate SICS across Europe. Furthermore, biophysical, sociocultural, economic, and policy reasons for (non)adoption were studied. Results at the plot/farm scale showed a small positive impact of SICS on environment and soil, no effect on sustainability, and small negative impacts on economic and sociocultural dimensions. Modelling showed that different SICS had different impacts across Europe—indicating the importance of understanding local dynamics in Europe-wide assessments. Work on adoption of SICS confirmed the role economic considerations play in the uptake of SICS, but also highlighted social factors such as trust. The project’s results underlined the need for policies that support and enable a transition to more sustainable agricultural practices in a coherent way.