A new version of this entry is available:
Loading...
Article
2025
Autonomous weapons: considering the rights and interests of soldiers
Autonomous weapons: considering the rights and interests of soldiers
Abstract (English)
The development of autonomous weapons systems (AWSs), which would make decisions on the battlefield without direct input from humans, has the potential to dramatically change the nature of war. Due to the revolutionary potential of these technologies, it is essential to discuss their moral implications. While the academic literature often highlights their morally problematic nature, with some proposing outright banning them, this paper highlights an important benefit of AWSs: protecting the lives, as well as the mental and physical health of soldiers. If militaries can avoid sending humans into dangerous situations or relieve drone operators from tasks that lead to lifelong trauma, this obviously appears morally desirable – especially in a world where many soldiers are still drafted against their will. Nonetheless, there are many arguments against AWSs. However, we show that although AWSs are potentially dangerous, criticisms apply equally to human soldiers and weapons steered by them. The combination of both claims makes a strong case against a ban on AWSs where it is possible. Instead, researchers should focus on mitigating their drawbacks and refining their benefits.
File is subject to an embargo until
This is a correction to:
A correction to this entry is available:
This is a new version of:
Other version
Notes
Publication license
Publication series
Published in
Ethics and information technology, 27 (2025), 4, 53.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-025-09859-w.
ISSN: 1572-8439
Other version
Faculty
Institute
Examination date
Supervisor
Cite this publication
Haiden, M., & Richter, F. (2025). Autonomous weapons: considering the rights and interests of soldiers. Ethics and information technology, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-025-09859-w
Edition / version
Citation
DOI
ISSN
ISBN
Language
English
Publisher
Publisher place
Classification (DDC)
170 Ethics
Original object
University bibliography
Standardized keywords (GND)
Sustainable Development Goals
BibTeX
@article{Haiden2025,
doi = {10.1007/s10676-025-09859-w},
author = {Haiden, Michael and Richter, Florian},
title = {Autonomous weapons: considering the rights and interests of soldiers},
journal = {Ethics and information technology},
year = {2025},
volume = {27},
number = {4},
}