HCI driving alienation: autonomy and involvement as blind spots in digital ethics

dc.contributor.authorJungtäubl, Marc
dc.contributor.authorZirnig, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorRuiner, Caroline
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-02T12:25:42Z
dc.date.available2026-02-02T12:25:42Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.updated2025-02-10T12:55:27Z
dc.description.abstractThe ongoing development and adoption of digital technologies such as AI in business brings ethical concerns and challenges. Main topics are the design of digital technologies, their tasks, and competencies in organizational practice, and their collaboration with humans. Previous guidelines on digital ethics mainly consider technological aspects such as the nondiscriminatory design of AI, its transparency, and technically constrained (distributed) agency as priorities in AI systems, leaving the consideration of the human factor and the implementation of ethical guidelines in organizational practice unclear. We analyze the relationship between human–computer interaction (HCI), autonomy, and worker involvement with its impact on the experience of alienation at work for workers. We argue that the consideration of autonomy and worker involvement is crucial for HCI. Based on a quantitative empirical study of 1989 workers in Germany, the analysis shows that when worker involvement is high, the effect of HCI use on alienation decreases. The study results contribute to the understanding of the use of digital technologies with regard to worker involvement, reveal a blind spot in widespread ethical debates about AI, and have practical implications with regard to digital ethics in organizational practice.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00298-1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/17203
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.licensecc_by
dc.subjectAlienation
dc.subjectAutonomy
dc.subjectWorker involvement
dc.subjectDigital ethics
dc.subjectHuman–computer interaction
dc.subject.ddc170
dc.titleHCI driving alienation: autonomy and involvement as blind spots in digital ethicsen
dc.type.diniArticle
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAI and 3thics, 4 (2024), 2, 617-634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00298-1. ISSN: 2730-5961 Cham : Springer International Publishing
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issn2730-5961
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issue2
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleAI and ethics
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameSpringer International Publishing
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplaceCham
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend634
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart617
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume4
local.export.bibtex@article{Jungtäubl2024, doi = {10.1007/s43681-023-00298-1}, author = {Jungtäubl, Marc and Zirnig, Christopher and Ruiner, Caroline et al.}, title = {HCI driving alienation: autonomy and involvement as blind spots in digital ethics}, journal = {AI and Ethics}, year = {2024}, volume = {4}, number = {2}, pages = {617--634}, }
local.subject.sdg8
local.subject.sdg9
local.title.fullHCI driving alienation: autonomy and involvement as blind spots in digital ethics
local.university.bibliographyhttps://hohcampus.verw.uni-hohenheim.de/qisserver/a/fs.res.frontend/pub/view/42528

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
43681_2023_Article_298.pdf
Size:
778.23 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
7.85 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: