Fakultät Agrarwissenschaften

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/9

Die Fakultät entwickelt in Lehre und Forschung nachhaltige Produktionstechniken der Agrar- und Ernährungswirtschaft. Sie erarbeitet Beiträge für den ländlichen Raum und zum Verbraucher-, Tier- und Umweltschutz.

Homepage: https://agrar.uni-hohenheim.de/

Browse

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6

Climate on the edge: impacts and adaptation in Ethiopia’s agriculture
(2025) Feleke, Hirut Getachew; Amdie, Tesfaye Abebe; Rasche, Frank; Mersha, Sintayehu Yigrem; Brandt, Christian; Younos, Tamim; Lee, Juneseok; Parece, Tammy E.
Climate change poses a significant threat to Ethiopian agriculture, impacting both cereal and livestock production through rising temperatures, erratic rainfall, prolonged droughts, and increased pest and disease outbreaks. These challenges intensify food insecurity, particularly for smallholder farmers and pastoralists who rely on climate-sensitive agricultural systems. This systematic review aims to synthesize the impacts of climate change on Ethiopian agriculture, with a specific focus on cereal production and livestock feed quality, while exploring effective adaptation strategies that can support resilience in the sector. The review synthesizes 50 peer-reviewed publications (2020–2024) from the Climate Change Effects on Food Security project, which supports young African academics and Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in addressing Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Using PRISMA guidelines, the review assesses climate change impacts on major cereal crops and livestock feed in Ethiopia and explores adaptation strategies. Over the past 30 years, Ethiopia has experienced rising temperatures (0.3–0.66 °C), with future projections indicating increases of 0.6–0.8 °C per decade resulting in more frequent and severe droughts, floods, and landslides. These shifts have led to declining yields of wheat, maize, and barley, shrinking arable land, and deteriorating feed quality and water availability, severely affecting livestock health and productivity. The study identifies key on-the-ground adaptation strategies, including adjusted planting dates, crop diversification, drought-tolerant varieties, soil and water conservation, agroforestry, supplemental irrigation, and integrated fertilizer use. Livestock adaptations include improved breeding practices, fodder enhancement using legumes and local browse species, and seasonal climate forecasting. These results have significant practical implications: they offer a robust evidence base for policymakers, extension agents, and development practitioners to design and implement targeted, context-specific adaptation strategies. Moreover, the findings support the integration of climate resilience into national agricultural policies and food security planning. The Climate Change Effects on Food Security project’s role in generating scientific knowledge and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration is vital for building institutional and human capacity to confront climate challenges. Ultimately, this review contributes actionable insights for promoting sustainable, climate-resilient agriculture across Ethiopia.
Computational aspects of experimental designs in multiple-group mixed models
(2023) Prus, Maryna; Filová, Lenka
We extend the equivariance and invariance conditions for construction of optimal designs to multiple-group mixed models and, hence, derive the support of optimal designs for first- and second-order models on a symmetric square. Moreover, we provide a tool for computation of D - and L -efficient exact designs in multiple-group mixed models by adapting the algorithm of Harman et al. (Appl Stoch Models Bus Ind, 32:3–17, 2016). We show that this algorithm can be used both for size-constrained problems and also in settings that require multiple resource constraints on the design, such as cost constraints or marginal constraints.
Design and development of an accessible open-source augmented reality learning authoring tool for applications in agroecological settings
(2024) Shidende, Deogratias; Treydte, Anna
Augmented Reality (AR) has emerged as a transformative educational technology, offering immersive, multisensory learning experiences that enhance engagement, conceptual understanding, and contextualization. In agroecology, where students must grasp complex ecological interactions and context-dependent knowledge, AR can bridge the gap between classroom instruction and field-based learning. However, the creation of AR content remains largely inaccessible to many educators in higher learning institutions (HLIs), particularly those without programming skills and individuals with disabilities such as the deaf and hard of hearing (DHH), and the blind and low vision (BLV). This dissertation addresses the central question: How can an accessible AR learning authoring tool enable non-technical educators and users with disabilities to create AR learning experiences for agroecology education in HLIs? To address this question, the study employed a design-based research (DBR) methodology, integrating Agile Scrum for iterative, inclusive tool development. Seven research questions (RQ1–RQ7) guided the investigation. First, a document-based analysis (RQ1) compared open-source software licenses (OSLs) to determine their suitability for academic–industry collaboration. Permissive licenses (e.g., MIT, BSD) were found to offer more flexibility in code reuse and integration, thereby promoting long-term project sustainability, although they require supplementary legal mechanisms to ensure reciprocity. Next, functional and non-functional software requirements (RQ2) were elicited through stakeholder workshops, interviews, surveys, and accessibility evaluations. These requirements informed the selection and redesign of MirageXR, an open-source AR platform. Key accessibility features were specified for DHH users, such as customizable captioning of audio augmentations, and for BLV users, such as voice navigation and spatial audio cues. These enhancements underscored the dual instructional and assistive roles of AR tools. In response to RQ3, a modular, component-based software architecture was designed using the C4 model. This enabled seamless integration of external services (e.g., 3D object repositories, learning management systems, and automatic speech recognition) and ensured that features could be added or updated without disrupting system stability. This modularity was essential given the evolving nature of AR technologies. The design and implementation phases (RQ4 & RQ5) employed participatory iterative prototyping with user feedback throughout the development process. Accessibility features were integrated into image, audio, and video augmentations, with functionalities such as caption editing, playback speed control, and 3D spatial positioning. These solutions directly addressed gaps in existing AR authoring tools, particularly for DHH and BLV users. The sixth research question (RQ6) investigated usability and applicability through an AR creation workshop involving 24 agroecology educators. Findings revealed that although participants initially encountered difficulties, they gained proficiency over time. UMUX scores showed a correlation between AR experience and perceived usefulness. Participants highlighted AR's potential to visualize complex concepts and engage students in experiential learning. However, limitations in 3D content availability and customization highlighted the need for integrated 3D content creation and editing tools specifically tailored to agroecology. To answer RQ7, the study conducted a systematic literature review of 60 studies to identify current accessibility evaluation methods in AR. Most evaluations employed task-based scenarios, utilizing metrics such as time on task, error rate, and user satisfaction. The study's own evaluation validated that DHH users could independently author AR content using the developed tool. In contrast, BLV users could navigate the authoring functionalities but were unable to fully author AR content, indicating that further design improvements and assistive functionalities are required for full inclusion. Methodologically, this study contributes a novel integration of DBR and Agile Scrum for inclusive educational technology design. This hybrid framework facilitated rapid prototyping, iterative refinement, and participatory co-design, and is recommended for broader application in accessibility-focused educational innovation. Future research should document and validate this methodological approach across additional contexts and user groups. The study makes the following contributions: (1) provision of an open-source, extensible AR authoring interfaces and codebase for public use; (2) improved AR accessibility for AR for DHH and BLV users; (3) development of modular architectural and algorithmic solutions to enable multimodal accessibility; (4) empirical validation of AR’s pedagogical value in agroecology education; and (5) identification of optimal open-source licensing models for collaborative educational software development. In sum, the findings demonstrate that an accessible, open-source AR authoring tool can empower diverse educators, including those with disabilities, to create inclusive and contextually relevant learning experiences. The research affirms the importance of universal design, participatory development, and modularity in educational technology design and concludes with strategic recommendations: integrating AI-assisted 3D content generation, expanding accessibility to additional user groups, and establishing communities of practice to support sustainable AR content development in agroecology.
Reaping what we sow: centering values in food systems transformations research
(2025) Care, O.; Zaehringer, Julie G.; Bernstein, Michael J.; Chapman, Mollie; Friis, Cecilie; Graham, Sonia; Haider, L. Jamila; Hernández-Morcillo, Mónica; Hoffmann, Harry; Kernecker, Maria Lee; Pitt, Hannah; Seufert, Verena
In many transdisciplinary research settings, a lack of attention to the values underpinning project aims can inhibit stakeholder engagement and ultimately slow or undermine project outcomes. As a research collective (The Careoperative), we have developed a set of four shared values through a facilitated visioning process, as central to the way we work together: care, reflexivity, inclusivity, and collectivity. In this paper, we explore the implications of a values-centered approach to collaboration in food system transformation research. The paper presents two cases that illustrate how researchers might approach centering values in practice. Where much research on food system transformation focuses on values of food system stakeholders, we contribute insights into the values of researchers in such transdisciplinary endeavors. Specifically, we argue that researchers working on sustainability transformations need to be better prepared to engage in such reflections and aspire to embody values aligned with the transformations they seek to research.
The role of biodiversity in consumer research on food : a review and research agenda
(2025) Schneider, Deborah; Osieja, Sanja; Herbes, Carsten; Weinrich, Ramona
The move towards sustainable consumption has drawn significant attention from scholars and practitioners alike. Biodiversity is an integral part of environmental sustainability and food security, but it has received little attention in consumer research. Findings are fragmented into how biodiversity as a product attribute affects consumer food choices. Thus, we conducted a systematic literature review on consumer research on biodiversity in the context of food choice. We reviewed 45 papers published between 2014 and March 2025. Our analysis was guided by the TCCM (Theories, Contexts, Characteristics, and Methodology) framework for developing a systematic literature review. We examined how biodiversity was conceptualized and defined within the studies and towards study participants. Our findings show that biodiversity as a product attribute generally has positive effects on consumer attitude, willingness to pay, and product choice. However, knowledge about biodiversity and the inherent trade-offs in product choices remains limited, so consumers cannot realistically factor biodiversity into their decision-making. We find that research has taken a narrow view of biodiversity, qualitative studies are rare, and few efforts have been made to build theoretical perspectives from empirical data. We conclude with a proposed agenda for future research and a tentative definition of biodiversity for social science.
Weaving knowledge, innovation, and learning: a transdisciplinary pathway to circular bioeconomy through BioBeo
(2025) Buruleanu, Claudia Lavinia; Chléirigh, Laoise Ní; Nic an Bhaird, Máire; Curran, Thomas P.; Reinmuth, Evelyn; Bîzoi, Mihai; Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L.
The bioeconomy represents a new way of life for people, but also a responsibility towards the future of the planet. Generating a significant socio-economic impact, it could be viewed as a key element of sustainable development, as the current and future solution for economic processes, based on new development models compelled by climate changes and the economy’s resilience to potential crises. In this context, the paper presents in its first part the Circular Economy description and the Circular Bioeconomy discussion from an interdisciplinary perspective. The second part of the paper aims to explore education as a tool for facilitating systemic changes supporting a real transition to a sustainable bioeconomy. The key aspects discussed refer to the following: (1) European policies, strategies, and action plans for bioeconomy; (2) Circular Economy as a solution for sustainable food systems; (3) main requirements and challenges for developing a (Circular) Bioeconomy, including indicators of sustainability; (4) the links between Circular Bioeconomy and the Sustainable Development Goals; (5) possibilities for integrating the agri-food industry’s needs into bioeconomy education; and (6) pathways for teach bioeconomy concepts effectively.

Browse

Browsing Fakultät Agrarwissenschaften by Sustainable Development Goals "4"