The chicken gut microbiome in conventional and alternative production systems

dc.contributor.authorCheng, Yu-Chieh
dc.contributor.authorKrieger, Margret
dc.contributor.authorKorves, Anna-Maria
dc.contributor.authorCamarinha‑Silva, Amélia
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-08T12:17:27Z
dc.date.available2025-12-08T12:17:27Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.date.updated2025-12-04T16:38:04Z
dc.description.abstractThe poultry gut microbiome plays a key role in nutrient digestion, immune function, and overall health. Differences among various farming systems, including conventional, antibiotic-free, free-range, and organic systems, influence microbial composition and function through variations in diet, genetic selection, environmental exposure, and antibiotic use. Conventional systems typically rely on formulated diets and controlled housing conditions, often with routine antimicrobial use. In contrast, organic systems emphasize natural feed ingredients, including roughage, outdoor access, and strict limitations on the use of antibiotics. These divergent practices shape the gut microbiota differently, with organic systems generally associated with greater exposure to environmental microbes and, consequently, greater microbial diversity. However, the implications of this increased diversity for poultry health and performance are complex, as organic systems may also carry a higher risk of pathogen exposure. This review summarizes current findings on the chicken gut microbiome across conventional and alternative production systems (antibiotic-free, free-range, and organic), focusing on microbial diversity, functional potential, and disease resilience. The need for standardized methodologies and consistent nomenclature in microbiome research is also discussed to improve comparability across studies. Understanding how production systems influence the gut microbiota is essential for improving poultry health and productivity while addressing challenges related to antimicrobial resistance and sustainable farming practices.en
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
dc.description.sponsorshipBundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschafthttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100005908
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversität Hohenheim (3153)
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-025-01293-8
dc.identifier.urihttps://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/18626
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.licensecc_by
dc.subjectAntimicrobial resistance
dc.subjectChicken
dc.subjectGut microbiome
dc.subjectOrganic
dc.subjectProduction systems
dc.subject.ddc630
dc.titleThe chicken gut microbiome in conventional and alternative production systemsen
dc.type.diniArticle
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of animal science and biotechnology, 16 (2025), 153. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-025-01293-8. ISSN: 2049-1891 London : BioMed Central
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber153
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issn2049-1891
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleJournal of animal science and biotechnology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameBioMed Central
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplaceLondon
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume16
local.export.bibtex@article{Cheng2025, doi = {10.1186/s40104-025-01293-8}, author = {Cheng, Yu-Chieh and Krieger, Margret and Korves, Anna-Maria et al.}, title = {The chicken gut microbiome in conventional and alternative production systems}, journal = {Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology}, year = {2025}, volume = {16}, }
local.subject.sdg2
local.subject.sdg3
local.subject.sdg12
local.title.fullThe chicken gut microbiome in conventional and alternative production systems

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
40104_2025_Article_1293.pdf
Size:
2.97 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
7.85 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: