Benchmarking of secure group communication schemes with focus on IoT

dc.contributor.authorPrantl, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorBauer, André
dc.contributor.authorEngel, Simon
dc.contributor.authorHorn, Lukas
dc.contributor.authorKrupitzer, Christian
dc.contributor.authorIffländer, Lukas
dc.contributor.authorKounev, Samuel
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-27T07:39:49Z
dc.date.available2026-02-27T07:39:49Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.updated2025-06-18T14:19:07Z
dc.description.abstractAs Internet of Things (IoT) devices become ubiquitous, they face increasing cybersecurity threats. Unlike standard 1-to-1 communication, the unique challenge posed by n-to-n communication in IoT is that messages must not be encrypted for a single recipient but for a group of recipients. For this reason, using Secure Group Communication (SGC) schemes is necessary to encrypt n-to-n communication efficiently for large group sizes. To this end, the literature presents various SGC schemes with varying features, performance profiles, and architectures, making the selection process challenging. A selection from this multitude of SGC schemes should best be made based on a benchmark that provides an overview of the performance of the schemes. Such a benchmark would make it much easier for developers to select an SGC scheme, but such a benchmark still needs to be created. This paper aims to close this gap by presenting a benchmark for SGC schemes that focus on IoT. Since the design of a benchmark first requires the definition of the underlying business problems, we defined suitable problems for using SGC schemes in the IoT sector as the first step. We identified a common problem for the centralized and decentralized/hybrid SGC schemes, whereas the distributed/contributory SGC schemes required defining an independent business problem. Based on these business problems, we first designed a specification-based benchmark, which we then extended to a hybrid benchmark through corresponding implementations. Finally, we deployed our hybrid benchmark in a typical IoT environment and measured and compared the performance of different SGC schemes. Our findings reveal notable impacts on calculation times and storage requirements without a trusted Central Instance (CI) in distributed/contributory SGC schemes.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s44248-024-00010-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/17835
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.licensecc_by
dc.subjectSecure Group Communication scheme
dc.subjectBenchmark
dc.subjectIoT security
dc.subjectGroup key agreement
dc.subject.ddc000
dc.titleBenchmarking of secure group communication schemes with focus on IoTen
dc.type.diniArticle
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDiscover data, 2 (2024), 1, 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44248-024-00010-6. ISSN: 2731-6955 Cham : Springer International Publishing
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber5
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issn2731-6955
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issue1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleDiscover data
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameSpringer International Publishing
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplaceCham
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume2
local.export.bibtex@article{Prantl2024, doi = {10.1007/s44248-024-00010-6}, author = {Prantl, Thomas and Bauer, André and Engel, Simon et al.}, title = {Benchmarking of Secure Group Communication schemes with focus on IoT}, journal = {Discover Data}, year = {2024}, volume = {2}, number = {1}, }
local.subject.sdg9
local.subject.sdg16
local.title.fullBenchmarking of Secure Group Communication schemes with focus on IoT
local.university.bibliographyhttps://hohcampus.verw.uni-hohenheim.de/qisserver/a/fs.res.frontend/pub/view/44523

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
44248_2024_Article_10.pdf
Size:
3.96 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
7.85 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: