Systematic selection of best performing mathematical models for in vitro gas production using machine learning across diverse feeds

dc.contributor.authorAhmadi, Hamed
dc.contributor.authorTitze, Natascha
dc.contributor.authorWild, Katharina
dc.contributor.authorRodehutscord, Markus
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-08T11:49:20Z
dc.date.available2025-12-08T11:49:20Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.date.updated2025-10-30T17:08:37Z
dc.description.abstractIn vitro gas production (GP) is commonly used to evaluate ruminant feed, yet its accurate interpretation requires robust mathematical modeling. This study systematically explores a wide array of nonlinear models to explain GP dynamics across various feed types, addressing the question: how can efficient and versatile models that accurately represent GP profiles be identified? We hypothesized that distinct feed types exhibit unique GP characteristics, effectively captured by specific models, and that statistical and machine learning methodologies can streamline model selection. Utilizing a comprehensive dataset derived from 849 unique GP profiles across concentrate feed categories—including cereal and leguminous grains and processed protein feeds—21 candidate models were rigorously evaluated based on their goodness-of-fit metrics, with a particular emphasis on Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) for model selection. A group of three models—namely Burr XII, Inverse paralogistic, and Log-logistic—consistently emerged as top performers, demonstrating high generalizability and predictive power across feed types. Notably, our analysis indicated that model type significantly influenced GP predictions, surpassing the impact of feed type characteristics. This research establishes a decision-making framework for model selection and sets the stage for further investigations linking in vitro GP parameters to in vivo digestibility, ultimately enhancing ruminant nutrition strategies.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15101-w
dc.identifier.urihttps://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/18256
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.licensecc_by
dc.subjectGas production
dc.subjectMathematical models
dc.subjectModel selection
dc.subjectMachine learning
dc.subject.ddc630
dc.titleSystematic selection of best performing mathematical models for in vitro gas production using machine learning across diverse feedsen
dc.type.diniArticle
dcterms.bibliographicCitationScientific reports, 15 (2025), 30711. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15101-w. ISSN: 2045-2322 London : Nature Publishing Group UK
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber30711
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issn2045-2322
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleScientific reports
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameNature Publishing Group UK
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplaceLondon
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume15
local.export.bibtex@article{Ahmadi2025, doi = {10.1038/s41598-025-15101-w}, author = {Ahmadi, Hamed and Titze, Natascha and Wild, Katharina et al.}, title = {Systematic selection of best performing mathematical models for in vitro gas production using machine learning across diverse feeds}, journal = {Scientific Reports}, year = {2025}, volume = {15}, }
local.subject.sdg2
local.subject.sdg12
local.subject.sdg13
local.title.fullSystematic selection of best performing mathematical models for in vitro gas production using machine learning across diverse feeds

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
41598_2025_Article_15101.pdf
Size:
5.47 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
7.85 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: