A new version of this entry is available:
Loading...
Article
2024
Participatory research at scale: a comparative analysis of four approaches to large-scale agricultural technology testing with farmers
Participatory research at scale: a comparative analysis of four approaches to large-scale agricultural technology testing with farmers
Abstract
Tailoring agricultural technology options to the diverse conditions of smallholder farmers requires innovative approaches for testing these technologies with farmers across varied contexts, while incorporating their feedback into learning and decision-making processes. This study compares four such approaches: the Farmer Field School on Participatory Plant Breeding (FFS-PPB), Farmer Research Network (FRN), Crowdsourcing–Triadic comparisons of technologies (Tricot), and adapted Mother–Baby Trial (MBT) as implemented by four concrete projects. The objectives are to provide detailed descriptions of these approaches and their project-specific implementations, identify and analyze common aspects and differences, and derive insights to guide future farmer-inclusive projects aiming at contextual scaling of agricultural technologies. A literature review, key informant interviews, and a systematic content analysis were conducted for the analysis. Common features include cascade training models, simple farmer-managed experiments, and the use of digital tools for data collection. Major differences lie in the extent of farmer–researcher collaboration and decision-making, as well as how technology option-by-context interactions are addressed. The FRN, FFS-PPB, and adapted MBT approaches involve farmers in decision-making throughout most stages of research, including co-learning cycles that adapt the research design and technology options to farmers’ needs. Although these approaches require more training and expertise, they increase the likelihood of achieving relevant results that farmers can implement in practice. In contrast, more standardized approaches like the Crowdsourcing–Tricot streamline the implementation, data management and analysis of large-scale trials, but have limitations in capturing the underlying reasons for farmers’ preferences. Among the studied approaches, the FRN as implemented by the Women's Fields project in Niger is particularly effective in identifying which options best suit specific farming contexts.
File is subject to an embargo until
This is a correction to:
A correction to this entry is available:
This is a new version of:
Other version
Notes
Publication license
Publication series
Published in
Outlook on agriculture, 53 (2024), 4, 320-335.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00307270241295763.
ISSN: 2043-6866
Sage UK: London, England : SAGE Publications
Other version
Faculty
Institute
Examination date
Supervisor
Cite this publication
Oberson, N., Moussa, H. O., Aminou, A. M., Kidane, Y. G., Luo, J. N., Giuliani, A., Weltzien, E., & Haussmann, B. I. (2024). Participatory research at scale: a comparative analysis of four approaches to large-scale agricultural technology testing with farmers. Outlook on agriculture, 53(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/00307270241295763
Edition / version
Citation
DOI
ISSN
ISBN
Language
English
Publisher
Publisher place
Classification (DDC)
630 Agriculture
Original object
University bibliography
Standardized keywords (GND)
Sustainable Development Goals
BibTeX
@article{Oberson2024,
doi = {10.1177/00307270241295763},
author = {Oberson, Nathalie and Moussa, Hannatou O and Aminou, Ali M et al.},
title = {Participatory research at scale: a comparative analysis of four approaches to large-scale agricultural technology testing with farmers},
journal = {Outlook on agriculture},
year = {2024},
volume = {53},
number = {4},
pages = {320--335},
}