Participatory research at scale: a comparative analysis of four approaches to large-scale agricultural technology testing with farmers

dc.contributor.authorOberson, Nathalie
dc.contributor.authorMoussa, Hannatou O
dc.contributor.authorAminou, Ali M
dc.contributor.authorKidane, Yosef Gebrehawaryat
dc.contributor.authorLuo, Juliet Nangamba
dc.contributor.authorGiuliani, Alessandra
dc.contributor.authorWeltzien, Eva
dc.contributor.authorHaussmann, Bettina IG
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T15:26:40Z
dc.date.available2025-12-11T15:26:40Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.updated2025-11-28T18:30:08Z
dc.description.abstractTailoring agricultural technology options to the diverse conditions of smallholder farmers requires innovative approaches for testing these technologies with farmers across varied contexts, while incorporating their feedback into learning and decision-making processes. This study compares four such approaches: the Farmer Field School on Participatory Plant Breeding (FFS-PPB), Farmer Research Network (FRN), Crowdsourcing–Triadic comparisons of technologies (Tricot), and adapted Mother–Baby Trial (MBT) as implemented by four concrete projects. The objectives are to provide detailed descriptions of these approaches and their project-specific implementations, identify and analyze common aspects and differences, and derive insights to guide future farmer-inclusive projects aiming at contextual scaling of agricultural technologies. A literature review, key informant interviews, and a systematic content analysis were conducted for the analysis. Common features include cascade training models, simple farmer-managed experiments, and the use of digital tools for data collection. Major differences lie in the extent of farmer–researcher collaboration and decision-making, as well as how technology option-by-context interactions are addressed. The FRN, FFS-PPB, and adapted MBT approaches involve farmers in decision-making throughout most stages of research, including co-learning cycles that adapt the research design and technology options to farmers’ needs. Although these approaches require more training and expertise, they increase the likelihood of achieving relevant results that farmers can implement in practice. In contrast, more standardized approaches like the Crowdsourcing–Tricot streamline the implementation, data management and analysis of large-scale trials, but have limitations in capturing the underlying reasons for farmers’ preferences. Among the studied approaches, the FRN as implemented by the Women's Fields project in Niger is particularly effective in identifying which options best suit specific farming contexts.
dc.description.sponsorshipKWS Saathttps://doi.org/10.13039/501100023515
dc.description.sponsorshipDeutsche Investitions- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH (DEG)
dc.description.sponsorshipMcKnight Foundationhttps://doi.org/10.13039/100005270
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/00307270241295763
dc.identifier.urihttps://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/18505
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.licensecc_by
dc.subjectSmallholder farmers
dc.subjectLarge-scale trials
dc.subjectOption-by-context interaction
dc.subjectCo-learning
dc.subjectOut-scaling
dc.subject.ddc630
dc.titleParticipatory research at scale: a comparative analysis of four approaches to large-scale agricultural technology testing with farmers
dc.type.diniArticle
dcterms.bibliographicCitationOutlook on agriculture, 53 (2024), 4, 320-335. https://doi.org/10.1177/00307270241295763. ISSN: 2043-6866 Sage UK: London, England : SAGE Publications
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issn0030-7270
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issn2043-6866
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issue4
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleOutlook on agriculture
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameSAGE Publications
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplaceSage UK: London, England
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend335
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart320
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume53
local.export.bibtex@article{Oberson2024, doi = {10.1177/00307270241295763}, author = {Oberson, Nathalie and Moussa, Hannatou O and Aminou, Ali M et al.}, title = {Participatory research at scale: a comparative analysis of four approaches to large-scale agricultural technology testing with farmers}, journal = {Outlook on agriculture}, year = {2024}, volume = {53}, number = {4}, pages = {320--335}, }
local.subject.sdg2
local.subject.sdg12
local.title.fullParticipatory research at scale: a comparative analysis of four approaches to large-scale agricultural technology testing with farmers

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10.1177_00307270241295763.pdf
Size:
4.39 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
7.85 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: